cmduke
This user hasn't shared any biographical information
Homepage: http://www.cmduke.com
Posts by cmduke
Windlight Viewer
Nov 17th
It’s been more than a full month since the last post; I’ll feel like such a slacker. The past four weeks have been busy including a trip this past week to Nashville for the League of Innovation in the Community College Conference on Information Technology; I presented an introduction to Second Life for a packed room during the last concurrent session of the conference. I’ll be writing more about the conference and several of the Second Life related goings on.
Before that however… Have you seen the Windlight Viewer? I’d noticed mention of it before and knew that it added a great deal of graphic detail to Second Life, but I finally downloaded it to try it out first hand. All I have to say is wow. In my presentation at the League, I commented that Second Life may not yet offer the graphically rich environments of some of the currently available commercial MMORPG’s. That’s true, but the Windlight Viewer makes a tremendous difference. I could try to explain, but it wouldn’t do any good. Two pictures are worth at least two thousand words, even at a smaller resolution. Click on each for the full effect. And, VTOReality has a more in depth post on the Windlight Viewer.
Social Networking Overload?
Nov 17th
(Back again, at least for now – November was an incredibly busy month!)
Interesting question and answer over at 2¢ Worth! by David Warlick
After attending David’s presentation, Bethany Smith commented on her blog (Transparent Learning):
In your presentation you discussed how teachers (and others I’m sure) cobble together tools such as aggregators, twitter, del.icio.us, etc. to be our social network – while our students use MySpace and Facebook. So where do the two meet? Is asking our teachers to use facebook a way to reach the existing pool of students? Or do we try to create a separate (and relatively safer) social network? I’m investigating the use of ELGG, but wonder if our students would want to have 2 social networks or not?
David answered . . .
That said, I’m not sure that the best use of social networking is a single networking tool, but a use of what ever tools or combination of tools are available to facilitate learning as a social and conversational endeavor, one that respects the perspective of the learner community and its ability to accomplish its own learning with guidance from participating teachers (master learners).
While I agree in principle with David, I think Bethany hits on a critical issue that I’ve experienced in my own classes (Intro to Computers at a Community College). There certainly are better tools than MySpace and Facebook for facilitating a classroom social network, and ideally, I’d prefer to use those (Ning.com comes to mind). However, I do believe user habits and “surfing-load” (like cognitive load but referencing the number of sites/online tools they’re expected to use) impact this discussion tremendously.
I’ve tried cobbling together what I believe are the most effective tools for each task: del.icio.us for social bookmarking, Google Reader for RSS aggregation, Blogger for blogging and Google Docs for collaborative writing etc. But, just trying to use those four tools for collaborative activities, which WebCT (err… Blackboard Vista) doesn’t currently support very well if at all, creates two additional user accounts and four new sites/tools for students. And, that’s on top of getting them to use WebCT on a regular basis. It just doesn’t happen. They don’t want to do it, and making the adjustment to use two new tools – even with classroom support – doesn’t function very well.
It may be ideal to use the other tools and other social networks based upon how well they facilitate the learning experience, but that’s just an ideal. With discussion of the need for education to “go native” and use the tools our students are using, I think it’s necessary and desirable to leverage the capabilities of, at least, Facebook. With the number of applications available for Facebook, I believe more successs will be found by engaging learners there rather than trying to string together other tools or trying to bring learners to a new tool, for them at least, like ELGG or Ning. And, I believe that’s even more true when it’s already difficult to get learners into the habit of checking WebCT for new discussion board posts.
Students Only Read Half of Class Material
Oct 17th
A quick added note on my previous post regarding Dr. Wesch’s “A Vision of Students Today.” The Chronicle picked up the story on the publication of Dr. Wesch’s video; however, they carried it under the headline, Kansas State U. Students Read Half of Class Material. The article suggests the video:
seems to indicate that higher education—-or perhaps just Kansas State University—-is failing to engage students.
I understood the sample was taken entirely from K-State, particularly given the details and description of the activity available on Dr. Wesch’s blog. I understood the purpose of the video was to highlight a prominent issue within higher education. I know the actual research activity was particularly engaging for the 200 students fortunate enough to be in Dr. Wesch’s class. I know, from recent experience, the undergraduate learning experience is in many instances exactly as Dr. Wesch’s course portrayed it. I clearly understand the communication technologies so-called millenials are using to interact with one another and that higher education should be taking advantage of those technologies in the classroom rather than barring them from it. As an educational technologist, the video provides a worthwhile starting point to trigger or further stoke a valuable conversation.
Any number of headlines could have been chosen to call attention to Dr. Wesch’s video. However, the headline chosen by The Chronicle, to me, seems at least uninformed and at most irresponsible or belligerent. Which is it? The Chronicle attempts to point out that Dr. Wesch’s sample is not necessarily representative of all higher education institutions; anyone taking the time to point that fact out should also be keenly aware that Dr. Wesch’s sample is also not necessarily representative of the entire Kansas State student body.
Thought Controlled Avatars
Oct 15th
A news story from The Chronicle highlights a brain-computer interface developed by a biomedical engineering lab in Japan. The input device allows users to control their Second Life avatars via brain activity rather than traditional input devices.
Read more after the jump.
This raises a great deal of potential for alternative educational delivery methods for learners with significant learning disabilities.
MojoPac for SecondLife?
Oct 14th
When I was originally looking for a way to use Second Life in computer labs which did not have it installed and do not allow users to install software, one of the suggestions I received/came across was MojoPac which enables a Virtual PC on a memory stick.
Of course, one of the original issues I encountered was the $30 price tag. This article from Lifehacker notes that MojoPac now offers a freeware version. This potentially provides a workaround for SL’ers working in labs or environments which do not support or allow SL installations. The only question is whether or not the current version of MojoPac requires administrative rights on the computer by the user running the application; if that’s the case, many academic labs will still preclude the use of MojoPac as an alternative.
A Vision of Students Today
Oct 13th
Dr. Michael Wesch (creator of The Machine is Using Us) has published a video focused on the relevance of digital culture to higher education; entitled A Vision of Students Today, the video was – as noted by Dr. Wesch’s blog Digital Ethnography – the result of a the following instructions:
… the basic idea is to create a 3 minute video highlighting the most important characteristics of students today – how they learn, what they need to learn, their goals, hopes, dreams, what their lives will be like, and what kinds of changes they will experience in their lifetime. We already know some things from previous research (and if you know of any interesting statistics, please list them along with the source). Others we will need to find out by doing a class survey. Please add whatever you want to know or present.
The blog describes the process and results of the survey which are used throughout the video. Definitely worth a read, a viewing and healthy resyndication ;-)
I discovered it reading Dean’s blog; Dean noticed it via a tweet from Bud.
Got a Blog? Help a Student
Oct 12th
I originally overlooked missed this October 1st post at the Official Google Blog, and I’m surprised I haven’t seen it in the feeds I read on a regular basis.
In short, Bloggers can issue a “Challenge” to their readers and the general internet public to support the Donors Choose program which connects donors with classroom projects and funding needs.
Now granted, I haven’t been reading ALL of my feeds lately, but I’m surprised that, in the ones I do manage to read on a daily basis, I haven’t seen mention of this elsewhere. More following the jumps below.
Google Blog, October 1
Donors Choose Blogger Challenge
Indexed on Learning
Oct 11th
I’ve been reading Indexed for some time now. In my words, it’s the world viewed, often comedically, through graphs and Venn diagrams. That sounds boring though. Blogger Jennifer Hagy’s description of her space is:
a little project that lets me make fun of some things and sense of others. I use it to think a little more relationally without resorting to doing actual math.
There’s been more than a few posts that have made me laugh out loud and more than a few posts that have made me think twice about an idea or concept.
Today, Ms. Hagy posted a graph that summarizes much of what I/we do. Visit Indexed. Add it to your feed reader.
Tracking Twitter
Oct 5th
Will be coming back to this new feature (as of 9/24/2007) from Twitter and discuss it in more detail. It’s worth a short post and quick mention.
In short, Twitter Tracking now makes it possible to receive alerts based upon keywords/tags/concepts. Rather than only receiving alerts from individuals you’ve chosen to follow, you may now receive alerts containing a particular keyword, phrase, concept or tag – whatever you want to call it.
While the Twitter Blog uses a couple of general examples, I’m going to use one related to attending educational conferences. When I go to the League of Innovation CIT conference to be held in Nashville in early November, I can submit to Twitter from my cell phone: “track leagueCIT.” After that, I’ll receive any tweets – as I understand it, by any Twitterers – containing the phrase “leagueCIT;” plus, I’ll have the option of then finding more information about that Twitterer and may choose to follow them as well.
Pretty cool stuff!
"Millenials" are NOT different learners!!
Sep 28th
Digital Natives
Net Generation
Millenials
Generation Y . . .
Most to nearly all of the literature I’ve read and conference sessions I’ve attended address the issue of “teaching millenials” as a matter of adapting to the changing learning styles that the current secondary to early college generation brings to the classroom. Characteristics and descriptors used to describe this generation of learners often include, in no particular order:
- connected
- social
- immediate
- experiential
- social
- teams
- structure
- engagement & experience
- visual & kinesthetic
- digitally literate
Consider these questions before reading any further . . . What are the most salient and enjoyable learning experiences you can recount from your high school, undergraduate or graduate studies? Take some time to describe one or more of those experiences. Also, which teacher(s) made an impression upon you and provided a particularly challenging learning experience?
Seriously. Stop and think for a minute. Describe that environment and what you remember about it. Get a mental picture. Consider and smile while you run through the experience in your head. Or, if someone’s available, share it with them.
Here’s several examples from my own education.
For High School Senior Math, I had Mr. Dean for a pre-Calculus type class. We used graphing calculators that were “way cool” to a math and gadget nerd. That year, he and I engaged in long discussions about different proofs – well beyond the work did in class. We talked about how much he enjoyed math, why he chose to teach it, and why he continued to teach even though he could have retired years earlier. We challenged one another. I continued to question, although naively, why 1/0 couldn’t actually be infinite. Sure, I understood the math, but I had logical reasons. We batted that one around for a long while. When I graduated he gave me a copy of an old calculus book that he personally enjoyed – complete with his autograph.
For a junior level, undergraduate literature class, I had Dr. Tom Hanks (no relation, of course) for “Chaucer.” Each of us in the class had to learn to repeat the Prologue in English as Chaucer wrote it; we listened to audio tapes from others who had recorded their readings of the same material. As I remember it, we were challenged to complete an original research project; we were advised to work and discuss our work with one another. We were introduced to library resources that provided audio recordings of the entire Canterbury Tales and asked to practice reading in middle English. There were extensive class discussions that included more than a few impromptu debates; to that point in my education, I had not worked harder on any research project before that one.
In graduate school, I had Dr. Lauren Cifuentes for an Advanced Instructional Design course and Dr. Jenny Sandlin for Adult Education and Learning Theory. In both instances, I worked with classmates and colleagues on a project or two; we communicated with one another in a variety of ways, email included. I also felt compelled in both instances to negotiate a different individual project than what was originally planned and was afforded the opportunity to pursue my ideas. Those two instances allowed me to truly discover my own unique learning identity – something I now understand I had begun with Dr. Hanks and Mr. Dean but for which I didn’t have many other opportunities earlier in my career.
Each of those experiences were quality learning experiences; I enjoyed them. They all provided something new – new content, new formats, new methods of and approaches to communicating with teachers and classmates. I worked harder than I had worked before; I felt like I was learning in a new and different way, and I firmly believe, without question that each experience pressed me to be:
- connected
- social
- immediate
- experiential
- social
- teams
- structure
- engagement & experience
- visual & kinesthetic
- digitally literate
But wait.. That can’t be. I’m certainly NOT a millenial; the first six years of my teaching career were spent teaching pre-millenials (or prior to 2000, at least). So, how can MY memorable learning experiences have exhibited characteristics of what’s supposed to be unique and new with millenials just now coming to secondary and early college classrooms?
Easy. Millenials are NOT different learners than those of us not-so-millenials trying to teach them. When given the opportunity, I reacted positively to engaging, social, experiential, visual, connected learning experiences, and I’m pretty confident most learners would have if they encountered those unique teachers. And, in each instance, my contemporaries and I were more “technology literate” than those before us – even if that did only mean we had become used to using graphing calculators and seeing them connected to overhead projectors.
Millenials are NOT different learners, but just like us not-so-millenials before them, Millenials have the opportunity to learn with grander and newer technologies than the those available to their teachers when their teachers were in secondary or undergraduate education.
Millenials are NOT different learners. Certainly, we’re witnessing an exponential growth in technologies, but the technology does not mean millenial learning styles are that much more evolved than our own when we were at the same point in our education.
Millenails are NOT different learners. There’s just more communication technologies around us that can be used to help them get the kind of learning experiences I – and likely everyone else – had, even if on a rarer occassion, with the Mr. Dean’s, Dr. Hanks’, Dr. Cifuentes’ and Dr. Sandlin’s of the world. There are additional communication technologies that we should be including in our learning strategies; but that’s a matter of using the tools that are at our disposal rather than adjusting to a new kind of learner.
All the new technology around us means we, as teachers, have more ways to to provide experiential learning activities, to use incredible visualizations, and to offer complex computer-based virtual simulations – all in an effort to communicate with them.
It’s all about the conversation and communication. Millenials are not different learners.
(list of characteristics/descriptors taken from: Educating the Net Generation, Oblinger & Oblinger Eds. http://tinyurl.com/zrawj)



Hot Topics